KDL52W4100 Bravia Viera Aquos The Perils Of Choosing A Television

In the past buying a television was not a complicated affair. Today however the technological landscape is considerably different and hence it is far more difficult to make the decision over which TV to choose. The modern consumer must decipher the technical jargon whilst also make a choice between brands. Currently Sony Bravia, Panasonic Viera and Sharp Aquos are some of the more popular types of televisions although Samsung and LG are equally popular. Obviously brand name is not the only choice; equally important is the size of the screen and the resolution of that screen.





Brand naturally comes to the forefront of their minds when they think about buying a new television. Just as with the motor industry there is a great deal of badge snobbery with people choosing a Bravia or Viera purely because of the name that is on the model. That said, in the case of the Bravia or Viera, badge snobbery can relate to a high quality, technologically advanced piece of equipment. Ultimately the choice of television brand should be a decision based upon personal preference combined with detailed research.





When researching however it is important to recognise the fact that internet forums typically have limited worth as a research tool. For example, many forum posts highlighting the superiority of the Samsung or Bravia may have been written by Sony aficionados, limiting the worth of the post entirely. The best course of action when researching is to take heed of expert reviews and only use forums and user reviews as a general guide to finding the best TV set.





Even if the brands of television are similar there are marked differences, not purely in the style and design of the sets. For instance many industry experts regard the Bravia to currently be the best television on the market although the latest Samsung and Panasonic models do come close. LG models are considered to be the best budget option whilst those with no monetary restrictions should always opt for the Bravia.





Naturally the choice of brand should not be the only concern for the consumer. Of equal importance is the size of the screen and the resolution of that screen. Many people once they have decided to invest in a new flat panel television choose the largest screen size their budget will allow. This however is a common mistake, a TV set that is too large for a room can actually diminish the viewing experience; in such cases a television that suits the size of the room is the best option.





In the modern age nearly all televisions particularly the latest Bravia, Viera and Aquos models all have HD compatibility. HD is the level of definition that the screen can display; the H refers to the fact that it is high definition, currently the most advanced available. Most televisions new televisions will be HD ready, meaning that they are able to display HD images adequately; for the ultimate viewing experience however Full HD sets should be the preferred option.





Even these full HD models may have problems however. One of the most common is image blur where the technology is not able to display the images fast enough to keep up with the action; this frequently occurs during football matches or in action movies. Fortunately companies such as Soy have realised the problem and now the latest Bravia televisions have a refresh rate of 200 Hz, three times faster than regular flat panels.





Hopefully this article has made it clear that choosing a television is as much about personal preference than anything else. That said, ensuring that any new device has the capability to display HD signals is essential. As with any purchase it is essential that a process of detailed research is undertaken before parting with the proverbial; 'hard earned'.

Technology expert Thomas Pretty looks at the latest Sony Bravia televisions and their superiority in the marketplace.

kdl52w4100: kdl52w4100

kdl52w4100: lcd tv

Article Source: www.articlesnatch.com

KDL52W4100 LCD TV Or Plasma The Hardest Of Choices

Both the plasma and LCD TV have been with us for some time, being present in homes across the land. For the last few years these two technologies seem to have been battling it out for the title of most popular without a clear winner becoming evident. However in recent times the eco credentials of plasma technology have been called into question, leading many to surmise that the LCD TV will be the device of choice in the future. But what are the differences between the two technologies?





While plasma and LCD TV sets may look extremely similar the differences between the two technologies are startling. Both offer the viewer a sharp, stunningly crisp picture that is a marked step forward from the CRT sets of old. In addition; due to their flat and lightweight nature are a space saving and stylish addition to any home. Typically both varieties are available as widescreen; hence they allow the viewer to watch films in true widescreen definition.





An LCD TV, as the name suggests uses a liquid crystal display to produce an image. Without becoming bogged down in technical jargon, the screen is made up of hundreds of thousands of tiny pixels that change colour and shade as electrical current is passed through them. The LCD display is backlit producing the brightness levels. It is only when backlighting is combined with the pixel changes that an image is viewable.





Plasma TV technology differs greatly. Fundamentally a plasma screen is constructed from thousands of tiny gas pockets, typically filled with either xenon or neon. These plasma 'bubbles' change shade and brightness with minute changes in voltage; finally the image is put through phosphors made up of the three primary colours, only then is the eventual image produced.





Understandably the two technologies have distinct benefits and advantages. Hopefully the following will compare both technologies along a categorical line.





In terms of size and weight LCD and plasma TV models are quite similar. Normally plasma sets are available in larger screen sizes, usually up to around seventy one inches. LCD TV models on the other hand are usually available in smaller screen sizes and out of the two, are typically the lightest.





Picture quality for both types of television is good, it is generally understood that LCD televisions will perform better in smaller screen sizes, offering a better resolution than plasmas. Some plasma TV models do have the problem of image burn. Put simply this is when an image has been displayed for long periods of time and then stays as a residual image no matter what is being watched. Normally this will either be a network logo or a gaming screen. LCD TV models do not suffer from this problem.





Lifespan is another factor that can split the two technologies. An LCD TV can usually guarantee a lifespan of around sixty thousand hours, more tangibly around seven and a half years of continuous viewing. On the other hand some plasmas will lose around half their brightness after twenty thousand hours, although modern varieties are boasting the uniform sixty thousand viewing hours.





Hopefully this article has given an idea of the differences between plasma and LCD TV technology and how this relates to differences between devices. In terms of which to choose a great deal of the decision can be based upon personal preference. Those with an environmental conscience however will choose the LCD due to the energy efficiency issues with plasmas.

Technology expert Thomas Pretty studies the key considerations needed when choosing between a plasma or LCD TV and why Sony Bravia models have market superiority.

kdl52w4100: kdl-52w4100

kdl52w4100: kdl-52w4100

Article Source: www.articlesnatch.com